| Introduction | News 
        | Information | Resources 
        | Affiliate | Action 
        | Links | Contact 
 CADU NEWS 16Winter 2003/2004
ContentsFormation of 
        the International Coalition for a Ban on Uranium Weapons
 US Navy Knew Risks of DU in 1984
 Is DU Ammunition Being Fired at Hard Targets in
 Scotland?
 Campaign to Force Labelling of DU Munitions in Transportation
 British Soldiers Contaminated with DU
 Korean Island Bombed with DU
 28 Anti-DU Protestors Found Not Guilty
 Australia To Buy US DU Tank
 World Uranium Weapons Conference
 ATSDR Study Finds DU Site Could Have Caused Lung Cancer 
        and Kidney Disease
 Cleanup of DU in Serbia Gets Under Way
 Truck carrying DU Overturns
 MoD Denies it is to Phase-out DU Weapons
 Japanese Government Doesn't Even Know If It Is Risking 
        its Troops to DU Exposure
 US Government and Military Trying to Wriggle Out of DU Cleanup 
        at National Sites
 British Government Says No Central Register of DU in 
        Iraq Kept
 Summary Of Scientific Papers on DU
 Message from CADU to All Our Supporters
 Formation 
        of the International Coalition for a Ban on Uranium Weapons  
 A new coalition of grassroots 
        groups has formed with the aim to achieve a legal international ban on 
        depleted uranium weapons. CADU is one of the founding members of the International 
        Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW) and we are hugely optimistic 
        that working together this coalition offers a real opportunity to stop 
        the use of these toxic weapons. Despite being in its early days the coalition 
        already has the involvement of groups from around the world and a draft 
        international treaty has been written. Over the next few months we will 
        be working hard to establish a proper organisational structure, funding 
        and functioning teams. So far there have been two planning meetings and 
        a coalition headquarters has been set up in Amsterdam, the Netherlands. 
        CADU will act as a focus for inquiries into the coalition in the UK and 
        we will keep our members up to date with coalition developments in CADU 
        News. Below is the full mission statement 
        of the coalition:On October 13th, 2003, after a conference in Berlaar, Belgium, grassroots 
        organisations and experts in several disciplines launched an international 
        campaign for a ban on the military use of uranium [1] and other radioactive 
        materials in weaponry. These radioactive and chemically toxic weapons 
        were first used on a large scale by the US and the UK in the Gulf War 
        in 1991, subsequently in Bosnia and Yugoslavia by NATO, and again in the 
        war on Iraq by the US and the UK in 2003. At least sixteen countries have 
        weapon systems with uranium in their arsenals [2].
 Because of mounting evidence 
        of harmful effects of uranium on human health and the environment, we 
        call for an immediate and universal ban [3] on the military use of uranium 
        and other radioactive materials. In addition, we call for the cleaning 
        up of all sites contaminated by these weapons along with compensation 
        for all affected populations. We call for a halt to the production, testing, 
        sale, stockpiling, transport and export of these weapons and a decommissioning 
        of all existing stockpiles. We call for immediate medical assessment, 
        treatment and long term monitoring of all those who have been exposed 
        to uranium weaponry. We demand from the accountable governments full disclosure 
        of all locations where uranium weapons have been used as well as the amounts 
        of uranium involved. We call for financial support from organisations 
        and individuals to provide independent medical and environmental investigations 
        of affected countries. Finally, we call on governments to exclude their 
        troops from alliance with any government that uses uranium munitions. In pursuit of these goals, 
        the organisations below have established the International Coalition to 
        Ban Uranium Weapons. We announced the start of our campaign in mid-October 
        at the CSC (Christian Labour Union) in Brussels and at the Uranium Weapons 
        Conference held in Hamburg. Within two months of the Berlaar conference, 
        over thirty organisations had given us their support. We call on non-governmental 
        organisations, governments and other interested parties to join us in 
        this urgent effort. The Coalition encourages and 
        supports direct action, campaigns and the formation of national coalitions 
        to inform and educate the public regarding uranium-its origin, properties, 
        use, and impact on human health and the environment. The Coalition is 
        working on a Draft Convention on the Prohibition against the Development, 
        Production, Possession and Use of Uranium Weapons and is planning to hold 
        an international conference in Brussels in May 2004 to launch a full-scale 
        international campaign. To find out more please 
        visit: http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/ Notes [1] 'Uranium' here refers to 
        so-called 'depleted' uranium and to depleted uranium mixed with recycled 
        reactor fuel, which contains plutonium and other fission products. We 
        consider the term 'depleted uranium' to be grossly misleading. However, 
        because it is already widely used in activist and scientific communities, 
        we will use this term or the abbreviation DU, as needed to avoid confusing 
        those already accustomed to it.[2] Bahrain, France, Greece, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Pakistan, Russia, 
        Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, 
        United Kingdom, United States of America
 [3] On use of the term 'ban' or 'prohibition': Although we believe that 
        the use of uranium weapons is already prohibited by existing international 
        laws, we nevertheless believe that we need to establish an explicit and 
        comprehensive prohibition of production, possession and sale. The fact 
        that such weapons are in active use, despite existing international laws 
        and that warnings supported by independent scientific research have been 
        raised, indicate the need to address this issue clearly and directly leaving 
        no doubt about the will of the majority on these specific weapons. We 
        are also convinced that seeking a comprehensive convention that includes 
        a clear demand for compensation will help to establish the groundwork 
        for eventual compensation of victims.
 List of Founding Coalition 
        Partners Campaign Against Depleted Uranium 
        (CADU), United KingdomCampaign Against Radiation Exposure (CARE), Japan
 Center for Peace and Justice, US
 For Mother Earth, Belgium
 Grassroots Actions for Peace, US
 International Depleted Uranium Study Team (IDUST), US
 German Affiliate of the International
 Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)
 Laka Foundation (Documentation and research centre on nuclear energy), 
        the Netherlands
 RISQ; Independent foreign policy think tank, the Netherlands
 Military Toxics Project (MTP), US
 NO DU Hiroshima Project, Japan
 Our Common Future, United Kingdom
 Stop USA, Belgium
 VD/AMOK (Documentation and research collective on the military), the Netherlands
 Youth Terminating Pollution, US
 US 
        Navy Knew Risks of DU in 1984 Papers secured for release 
        by Glen Milner of the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, USA, through 
        the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the US Navy have long known 
        about the dangers of DU munitions and that special precautions are needed 
        in handling and decontaminating these weapons. This evidence of pre-knowledge 
        is important because it predates usage in the 1991 Gulf War when soldiers 
        were not given safety instructions on using the weapons. It also exposes 
        the continued cover-up of the US military when they argue that DU usage 
        has no health risks and that decontamination after usage is not needed. 
        Page 3 of the document says: 8. Should DU be handled 
        in powdered form [DU munitions create a fine powder when fired due to 
        their pyrophoric nature] or should a DU penetrator oxidize resulting from 
        a penetrator's involvement in an accident such as a fire, then the intake 
        of DU aerosol or ash via inhalation, ingestion or absorption presents 
        an internal radiation hazard.9. Depending on the solubility of the particular DU compound in body fluids, 
        it may also be toxic, particularly to the kidney.
 10. Should an accident occur or DU corrosion be discovered, cleanup and 
        decontamination should be performed only by authorized personnel.
 11. Anyone who may have inadvertently come in contact with material that 
        is potentially contaminated with DU should be surveyed for decontamination 
        by authorised personnel as soon as possible, wash clothing that may be 
        contaminated, wash hands, arms, face and any other exposed part of the 
        body with soap and water. Do not eat, drink, smoke or apply cosmetics 
        before being satisfactorily decontaminated.
 The full documents can be viewed at: www.gzcenter.org/NavyDU.htm
 Is 
        DU Ammunition Being Fired at Hard Targets in Scotland?
 Photos taken by activists inside 
        the Dundrennan test fire range, near Kirkcudbright in southern Scotland, 
        show that weaponry has been shot at hard targets inside the test fire 
        area. The Dundrennan site is the main test fire range for DU weapons inside 
        the UK.  The MoD has always claimed 
        that DU weapons were only shot into the Solway Firth, the sea area bordering 
        the test fire range, and therefore argued there was no DU contamination 
        risk to the area. When grass and soil samples, taken as part of an environmental 
        study in 2000, showed DU levels "well above acceptable limits" 
        at the site the MoD claimed this was due to misfirings.  These new photos will raise 
        doubts as to the truth of these statements. The photos clearly show hard 
        targets, including burntout tanks riddled with ammunition holes, and close 
        up shots of ammunition casing. Local resident, Dan Kelly, who has campaigned 
        against the use of DU in the area for years has always maintained that 
        DU weapons were being shot at hard targets within the base. Is this the 
        evidence that can backup his claims? When photos were sent to the Scottish 
        Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), they replied they had no powers 
        to regulate MoD activity. CADU is currently attempting to get answers 
        to these questions and verify what munitions precisely has been used on 
        the targets. Meanwhile the anti-DU movement 
        in Scotland has been going from strength to strength. A petition with 
        400 signatures was handed into the Scottish parliament petitions committee, 
        who ruled that the Scottish Parliament does not have the compentency to 
        rule on the issue of DU weapons testing as defence and radioactive materials 
        are reserved issues. This despite the fact that environment and health 
        issues are devolved issues.  ACTIONFor more details on the Scottish campaign against DU please contact Galloway 
        Coalition for Justice & Peace: tel: 01671-403340, 01988-500730 or 
        01671-830390. See all the photos taken inside the Dundrennan test site
 Campaign 
        to Force Labelling of DU Munitions in Transportation Four groups in the United States, 
        Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, the Traprock Peace Center, the 
        Military Toxics Project and Nukewatch have started a "Depleted Uranium 
        Munitions Action Plan" to force the military to label DU munitions. 
        They argue that "The United States military does not want civilian 
        populations to know how and when DU munitions are being shipped through 
        their communities for fear of "unnecessary public concern about the 
        radiation risks associated with DU munitions."
 "Normally this type of 
        shipment would be labelled with both Department of Transportation (DOT) 
        "Radioactive" and "Explosive" placards. Branches of 
        the U.S. military, however, have a special Department of Transportation 
        exemption, DOT-E 9649, which allows them to ship DU munitions without 
        the "Radioactive" placard. The exemption must be renewed every 
        few years by the DOT and the Military Traffic Management Command. The current DU munitions shipping 
        exemption expires on June 30, 2004. Public pressure could force the DOT 
        to not renew the next application for exemption by the Military Traffic 
        Management Command. DU munitions should have a "Radioactive" 
        placard and an "Explosives" placard on shipments. DU is an extremely 
        toxic material and much more dangerous when shipped with an explosive 
        propellant as in the case of DU munitions."  The Department of Defence argues 
        there would be no increased risk to the public by not labelling the shipments 
        radioactive, because "in the unlikely event of an accident or incident 
        involving transportation of DU munitions, the DoD maintains Explosive 
        Ordinance Disposal teams nationwide trained in the health hazards associated 
        with DU munitions. These teams are capable of responding on short notice 
        with protective equipment and radiation survey instruments". Activists 
        however have countered this by pointing out that, without labelling, in 
        a fire or accident the local police and firefighters would have no idea 
        the shipment contained radioactive material. They are asking that the 
        public contact the Department of Transportation Exemptions division and 
        ask that the DOT immediately terminate and not renew DOT-E 9649. ACTIONWrite to your MP/MoD asking about DU transportation in the UK, and relevant 
        safety planning.
 British 
        Soldiers Contaminated with DU The Sunday Mirror reported 
        (30/11/2003) that five British Soldiers have so far tested positive for 
        depleted uranium contamination while fighting in Iraq. They were all believed 
        to have been in vehicles hit by DU shells in two 'friendly fire' attacks. 
        They now face the possibility of developing cancer or other diseases. Although these are the first 
        soldiers to have tested positive we can expect many more as most soldiers 
        have not so far returned and many are still facing armed combat. Most 
        worrying of all, as reported in the last CADU News, is that the tests 
        being offered to soldiers returning from this attack are not accurate 
        and are capable of giving a negative result when in fact contamination 
        has occurred. Scandalously the MoD has developed an accurate test in cooperation 
        with Leicester University but is not offering this test to soldiers from 
        the 2003 conflict. Instead it will only be made available to veterans 
        of the 1991 Gulf War.  Given the very real risk to 
        all soldiers and the necessity of testing all returning soldiers it must 
        be asked why continue to use these weapons at all? Korean 
        Island Bombed with DU The Maehyang-ri bombing range, 
        based on an island off South Korea, fires daily at the tiny surrounding 
        islands with fighter jets, including the DU-firing A-10. Communities who 
        live less than a mile away have had their lands taken and are now facing 
        toxic pollution. The villagers live by fishing and clam fishing but environmental 
        studies of the area have found the shellfish to be severely contaminated. 
        Villagers have also been hit by shells, with at least 12 killed. Thousands 
        of shells have gone off target and lodged in the hillsides around the 
        area. One entire island has already been wipe out while another two mile 
        long island has been reduced to two-thirds its original size. But the Maehyang-ri bombing 
        range isn't run by the US Air Force and it isn't run by the US Army. Five 
        years ago, the bombing range was privatized and turned over to the multinational 
        weapons contractor Lockheed Martin. Then, in July, the bombing range changed 
        hands. An Alaska-based company called Arctic Slope World Service took 
        over the contract. 28 
        Anti-DU Protestors Found Not Guilty On Friday, October 17, 2003, 
        a six-person jury of citizens from Hennepin County declared that International 
        Law can trump the local private property/no trespass law. At the height 
        of the recent war against Iraq, on April 2, 2003, 28 Minnesotans "crossed 
        the line," entering the world headquarters property of Alliant TechSystems 
        Corporation in Edina with the express purpose of conducting a "Citizens' 
        Weapons Inspection." The letter they carried demanded 
        that they have access to the books and records of Alliant TechSystems 
        Corporation (ATK) to see if they had completed any studies on the medical 
        and environmental effects of the DU uranium munitions they produce. The 
        defendants contended that there is significant evidence that the DU munitions 
        produced by ATK containing U-238, a radioactive substance with a half-life 
        of 4.5 billion years, is a prime suspect in escalating rates of cancers 
        and birth defects among residents of southern Iraq and US troops who served 
        in the first Gulf War. On April 2, 2003, 28 activists crossed the line 
        and entered Alliant TechSystems. On October 17, 2003 a public trial was 
        held and all 28 were found not guilty. Australia 
        To Buy US DU Tank Australia is set to buy 60 
        Abrams M1 battle tanks from the US for $600 million. Although modifications 
        are being made for the Australians, like replacing the DU armour with 
        ceramic plate, the Abrams tank still fires DU munitions. The choice of 
        the tank is to strengthen the alliance with the US by boosting "interoperability" 
        for future Iraq-style conflicts. In an indication of the strategic importance 
        of the move, the US Administration will handle the deal, selling the tanks 
        directly to Australia. Critics say the Abrams are unsuitable as they are 
        too heavy to be airlifted and deployed easily. Australia has never used its previous 30 year old tank fleet.
 World 
        Uranium Weapons Conference  
         
           
             
               Rae Street of CADU talking at the World
 Uranium Weapons Conference
 From October 16th-19th the 
        World Uranium Weapons Conference was held in Hamburg Germany. A mixture 
        of activists, scientists and veterans came to the conference from all 
        over the world, including two scientists from Iraq. Images and documents 
        from the conference can be viewed at:http://traprockpeace.org/du_hamburg_03
 ATSDR 
        Study Finds DU Site Could Have Caused Lung Cancer and Kidney Disease The Agency for Toxic Substances 
        and Disease Registry (ATSDR), has released a study of past emissions from 
        the Colonie Site (formerly National Lead Inc.) in Albany, N.Y. In the 
        study they found that "After evaluating the environmental data, ATSDR 
        concluded that past DU emissions from the plant were a public health hazard 
        and may possibly have increased the risk of kidney disease and lung cancer, 
        particularly for smokers who had lived near the plant. The extent to which 
        risk was increased, however, is unknown."  Residents near the plant however 
        are not satisfied with the study (which took 10 years to achieve) and 
        are considering bringing a class action lawsuit against National Lead's 
        successor company, Houston, Texas-based 'NL Industries Inc.' They claim 
        the study is full of omissions in data and inconsistencies and that several 
        serious areas such as the risk to children from contaminated soil have 
        been overlooked or dismissed. More than 89 residents have signed a petition 
        demanding "a comprehensive health study of the community impacted 
        by NL Industries pollution, with input from a community-appointed Citizen 
        Advisory Committee." They claim strong incidences of cancer and other 
        diseases occur around the plant. Cleanup 
        of DU in Serbia Gets Under Way A site contaminated with DU 
        in the 1999 bombing of Serbia has been decontaminated. The Serbian Government 
        claims that the cleanup at Bratoselce has been 95% effective. It has cost 
        the Serbian government 15 million dinars. Given that under International 
        Law weapons should not continue to have effect after the war has ended, 
        it is a shame that a poor country should have to pay so much money to 
        cleanup the mess left behind by rich NATO armies. Meanwhile more than 
        200 DU rounds have been found in a site near Presevo in Southern Serbia...
 Truck 
        carrying DU Overturns While the Department of Defence 
        continues to insist that there is no need to label transport carrying 
        DU, a road in Montana, USA, was closed when a truck carrying uranium hexafluoride 
        was found to have overturned. Authorities reopened the road some hours 
        later after determining there was no leakage. MoD 
        Denies it is to Phase-out DU Weapons
 An article in the Telegraph (21/09/2003) that the UK Government was planning 
        to phaseout DU tank rounds caused some excitement but proved to be a bit 
        premature. In a reply to a member of the public the MoD said ". This 
        article is not entirely accurate. .. To date DU has consistently out performed 
        all equivalents as a kinetic penetrator when employed in anti-armour weapon 
        systems: its use, therefore, offers the best operational effectiveness 
        in this role."
 Japanese 
        Government Doesn't Even Know If It Is Risking its Troops to DU Exposure In reply to questions asked 
        in the Japanese Parliament, the Japanese Government admitted that it did 
        not know if DU was used there by the US army, despite this being widely 
        publicised. One of the sites Japanese troops may be sent to, Samawah, 
        is believed to have been widely contaminated. US 
        Government and Military Trying to Wriggle Out of DU Cleanup at National 
        Sites The US Government and military 
        is trying to walk away from its commitments to cleanup sites contaminated 
        by DU and other radioactive materials at the Jefferson Proving Ground 
        (JPG), Indiana and Hanford, Washington. The army initially has a decommissioning 
        plan for JPG but now is saying that because of unexploded ordnance, it 
        is too dangerous to send Army workers into the area for decommissioning. 
        However environmental group 'Save the Valley' have put in a hearing request 
        that the regulations governing decommissioning do not provide for an open-ended 
        license with no timetable for decommissioning. If the Army is allowed 
        to not have a plan in place, a precedent could be set for how the same 
        issue is handled at other bases. At Hanford the Department of Energy is 
        attempting to avoid cleanup by redefining more than 3/4 of its most dangerous 
        radioactive wastes as 'incidental'. British 
        Government Says No Central Register of DU in Iraq Kept In response to written questions 
        in parliament asked by Angus Robertson MP to the Secretary of State for 
        Defence about British DU deployment, location and recovery in Iraq, he 
        replied "I am withholding information about numbers of rounds of 
        DU munitions deployed on operations (in Iraq)... All surplus DU ammunition 
        has now been returned to the UK. Obvious surface-lying DU fragments continue 
        to be removed from the battlefield as they are discovered, however the 
        details of DU findings are not held centrally." Summary 
        Of Scientific Papers on DU Prof. Glen Lawrence of Long 
        Island University has prepared summaries of many of the scientific papers 
        written on the health effects of DU. Although written primarily for those 
        with some scientific understanding it is very useful for anyone doing 
        research in this area or interested in finding out more on the subject. 
        Please contact CADU if you would like a copy of his work in email or paper 
        form. Message 
        from CADU to All Our Supporters Message 
        from CADU to All Our Supporters CADU would like to thank all 
        subscribers for their support. We have a bank of resources, including 
        exhibitions and leaflets so do give us a call if you want materials or 
        a speaker. We send seasonal greetings and best wishes for the New Year. 
        Never has peace been so linked to social justice.
 Subscribe to CADU News - by affiliating to CADU
 Affiliation rates (including a paper copy of CADU News four times a year) 
        are £8 per year (unwaged/student) £10 per year (waged) and 
        £30 (groups), but please consider donating more than this if possible.
 Please send a cheque or a request for a standing order to:
 CADU, Bridge 5 Mill, 22a Beswick St, Manchester M4 7HR
   |