Introduction | News
| Information | Resources
| Affiliate | Action
| Links | Contact
CADU NEWS 16
Winter 2003/2004
Contents
Formation of
the International Coalition for a Ban on Uranium Weapons
US Navy Knew Risks of DU in 1984
Is DU Ammunition Being Fired at Hard Targets in
Scotland?
Campaign to Force Labelling of DU Munitions in Transportation
British Soldiers Contaminated with DU
Korean Island Bombed with DU
28 Anti-DU Protestors Found Not Guilty
Australia To Buy US DU Tank
World Uranium Weapons Conference
ATSDR Study Finds DU Site Could Have Caused Lung Cancer
and Kidney Disease
Cleanup of DU in Serbia Gets Under Way
Truck carrying DU Overturns
MoD Denies it is to Phase-out DU Weapons
Japanese Government Doesn't Even Know If It Is Risking
its Troops to DU Exposure
US Government and Military Trying to Wriggle Out of DU Cleanup
at National Sites
British Government Says No Central Register of DU in
Iraq Kept
Summary Of Scientific Papers on DU
Message from CADU to All Our Supporters
Formation
of the International Coalition for a Ban on Uranium Weapons
A new coalition of grassroots
groups has formed with the aim to achieve a legal international ban on
depleted uranium weapons. CADU is one of the founding members of the International
Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons (ICBUW) and we are hugely optimistic
that working together this coalition offers a real opportunity to stop
the use of these toxic weapons. Despite being in its early days the coalition
already has the involvement of groups from around the world and a draft
international treaty has been written. Over the next few months we will
be working hard to establish a proper organisational structure, funding
and functioning teams. So far there have been two planning meetings and
a coalition headquarters has been set up in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
CADU will act as a focus for inquiries into the coalition in the UK and
we will keep our members up to date with coalition developments in CADU
News.
Below is the full mission statement
of the coalition:
On October 13th, 2003, after a conference in Berlaar, Belgium, grassroots
organisations and experts in several disciplines launched an international
campaign for a ban on the military use of uranium [1] and other radioactive
materials in weaponry. These radioactive and chemically toxic weapons
were first used on a large scale by the US and the UK in the Gulf War
in 1991, subsequently in Bosnia and Yugoslavia by NATO, and again in the
war on Iraq by the US and the UK in 2003. At least sixteen countries have
weapon systems with uranium in their arsenals [2].
Because of mounting evidence
of harmful effects of uranium on human health and the environment, we
call for an immediate and universal ban [3] on the military use of uranium
and other radioactive materials. In addition, we call for the cleaning
up of all sites contaminated by these weapons along with compensation
for all affected populations. We call for a halt to the production, testing,
sale, stockpiling, transport and export of these weapons and a decommissioning
of all existing stockpiles. We call for immediate medical assessment,
treatment and long term monitoring of all those who have been exposed
to uranium weaponry. We demand from the accountable governments full disclosure
of all locations where uranium weapons have been used as well as the amounts
of uranium involved. We call for financial support from organisations
and individuals to provide independent medical and environmental investigations
of affected countries. Finally, we call on governments to exclude their
troops from alliance with any government that uses uranium munitions.
In pursuit of these goals,
the organisations below have established the International Coalition to
Ban Uranium Weapons. We announced the start of our campaign in mid-October
at the CSC (Christian Labour Union) in Brussels and at the Uranium Weapons
Conference held in Hamburg. Within two months of the Berlaar conference,
over thirty organisations had given us their support. We call on non-governmental
organisations, governments and other interested parties to join us in
this urgent effort.
The Coalition encourages and
supports direct action, campaigns and the formation of national coalitions
to inform and educate the public regarding uranium-its origin, properties,
use, and impact on human health and the environment. The Coalition is
working on a Draft Convention on the Prohibition against the Development,
Production, Possession and Use of Uranium Weapons and is planning to hold
an international conference in Brussels in May 2004 to launch a full-scale
international campaign.
To find out more please
visit: http://www.bandepleteduranium.org/
Notes
[1] 'Uranium' here refers to
so-called 'depleted' uranium and to depleted uranium mixed with recycled
reactor fuel, which contains plutonium and other fission products. We
consider the term 'depleted uranium' to be grossly misleading. However,
because it is already widely used in activist and scientific communities,
we will use this term or the abbreviation DU, as needed to avoid confusing
those already accustomed to it.
[2] Bahrain, France, Greece, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Pakistan, Russia,
Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Taiwan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates,
United Kingdom, United States of America
[3] On use of the term 'ban' or 'prohibition': Although we believe that
the use of uranium weapons is already prohibited by existing international
laws, we nevertheless believe that we need to establish an explicit and
comprehensive prohibition of production, possession and sale. The fact
that such weapons are in active use, despite existing international laws
and that warnings supported by independent scientific research have been
raised, indicate the need to address this issue clearly and directly leaving
no doubt about the will of the majority on these specific weapons. We
are also convinced that seeking a comprehensive convention that includes
a clear demand for compensation will help to establish the groundwork
for eventual compensation of victims.
List of Founding Coalition
Partners
Campaign Against Depleted Uranium
(CADU), United Kingdom
Campaign Against Radiation Exposure (CARE), Japan
Center for Peace and Justice, US
For Mother Earth, Belgium
Grassroots Actions for Peace, US
International Depleted Uranium Study Team (IDUST), US
German Affiliate of the International
Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW)
Laka Foundation (Documentation and research centre on nuclear energy),
the Netherlands
RISQ; Independent foreign policy think tank, the Netherlands
Military Toxics Project (MTP), US
NO DU Hiroshima Project, Japan
Our Common Future, United Kingdom
Stop USA, Belgium
VD/AMOK (Documentation and research collective on the military), the Netherlands
Youth Terminating Pollution, US
US
Navy Knew Risks of DU in 1984
Papers secured for release
by Glen Milner of the Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, USA, through
the Freedom of Information Act reveal that the US Navy have long known
about the dangers of DU munitions and that special precautions are needed
in handling and decontaminating these weapons. This evidence of pre-knowledge
is important because it predates usage in the 1991 Gulf War when soldiers
were not given safety instructions on using the weapons. It also exposes
the continued cover-up of the US military when they argue that DU usage
has no health risks and that decontamination after usage is not needed.
Page 3 of the document says:
8. Should DU be handled
in powdered form [DU munitions create a fine powder when fired due to
their pyrophoric nature] or should a DU penetrator oxidize resulting from
a penetrator's involvement in an accident such as a fire, then the intake
of DU aerosol or ash via inhalation, ingestion or absorption presents
an internal radiation hazard.
9. Depending on the solubility of the particular DU compound in body fluids,
it may also be toxic, particularly to the kidney.
10. Should an accident occur or DU corrosion be discovered, cleanup and
decontamination should be performed only by authorized personnel.
11. Anyone who may have inadvertently come in contact with material that
is potentially contaminated with DU should be surveyed for decontamination
by authorised personnel as soon as possible, wash clothing that may be
contaminated, wash hands, arms, face and any other exposed part of the
body with soap and water. Do not eat, drink, smoke or apply cosmetics
before being satisfactorily decontaminated.
The full documents can be viewed at: www.gzcenter.org/NavyDU.htm
Is
DU Ammunition Being Fired at Hard Targets in
Scotland?
Photos taken by activists inside
the Dundrennan test fire range, near Kirkcudbright in southern Scotland,
show that weaponry has been shot at hard targets inside the test fire
area. The Dundrennan site is the main test fire range for DU weapons inside
the UK.
The MoD has always claimed
that DU weapons were only shot into the Solway Firth, the sea area bordering
the test fire range, and therefore argued there was no DU contamination
risk to the area. When grass and soil samples, taken as part of an environmental
study in 2000, showed DU levels "well above acceptable limits"
at the site the MoD claimed this was due to misfirings.
These new photos will raise
doubts as to the truth of these statements. The photos clearly show hard
targets, including burntout tanks riddled with ammunition holes, and close
up shots of ammunition casing. Local resident, Dan Kelly, who has campaigned
against the use of DU in the area for years has always maintained that
DU weapons were being shot at hard targets within the base. Is this the
evidence that can backup his claims? When photos were sent to the Scottish
Environment Protection Agency (SEPA), they replied they had no powers
to regulate MoD activity. CADU is currently attempting to get answers
to these questions and verify what munitions precisely has been used on
the targets.
Meanwhile the anti-DU movement
in Scotland has been going from strength to strength. A petition with
400 signatures was handed into the Scottish parliament petitions committee,
who ruled that the Scottish Parliament does not have the compentency to
rule on the issue of DU weapons testing as defence and radioactive materials
are reserved issues. This despite the fact that environment and health
issues are devolved issues.
ACTION
For more details on the Scottish campaign against DU please contact Galloway
Coalition for Justice & Peace: tel: 01671-403340, 01988-500730 or
01671-830390. See all the photos taken inside the Dundrennan test site
Campaign
to Force Labelling of DU Munitions in Transportation
Four groups in the United States,
Ground Zero Center for Nonviolent Action, the Traprock Peace Center, the
Military Toxics Project and Nukewatch have started a "Depleted Uranium
Munitions Action Plan" to force the military to label DU munitions.
They argue that "The United States military does not want civilian
populations to know how and when DU munitions are being shipped through
their communities for fear of "unnecessary public concern about the
radiation risks associated with DU
munitions."
"Normally this type of
shipment would be labelled with both Department of Transportation (DOT)
"Radioactive" and "Explosive" placards. Branches of
the U.S. military, however, have a special Department of Transportation
exemption, DOT-E 9649, which allows them to ship DU munitions without
the "Radioactive" placard. The exemption must be renewed every
few years by the DOT and the Military Traffic Management Command.
The current DU munitions shipping
exemption expires on June 30, 2004. Public pressure could force the DOT
to not renew the next application for exemption by the Military Traffic
Management Command. DU munitions should have a "Radioactive"
placard and an "Explosives" placard on shipments. DU is an extremely
toxic material and much more dangerous when shipped with an explosive
propellant as in the case of DU munitions."
The Department of Defence argues
there would be no increased risk to the public by not labelling the shipments
radioactive, because "in the unlikely event of an accident or incident
involving transportation of DU munitions, the DoD maintains Explosive
Ordinance Disposal teams nationwide trained in the health hazards associated
with DU munitions. These teams are capable of responding on short notice
with protective equipment and radiation survey instruments". Activists
however have countered this by pointing out that, without labelling, in
a fire or accident the local police and firefighters would have no idea
the shipment contained radioactive material. They are asking that the
public contact the Department of Transportation Exemptions division and
ask that the DOT immediately terminate and not renew DOT-E 9649.
ACTION
Write to your MP/MoD asking about DU transportation in the UK, and relevant
safety planning.
British
Soldiers Contaminated with DU
The Sunday Mirror reported
(30/11/2003) that five British Soldiers have so far tested positive for
depleted uranium contamination while fighting in Iraq. They were all believed
to have been in vehicles hit by DU shells in two 'friendly fire' attacks.
They now face the possibility of developing cancer or other diseases.
Although these are the first
soldiers to have tested positive we can expect many more as most soldiers
have not so far returned and many are still facing armed combat. Most
worrying of all, as reported in the last CADU News, is that the tests
being offered to soldiers returning from this attack are not accurate
and are capable of giving a negative result when in fact contamination
has occurred. Scandalously the MoD has developed an accurate test in cooperation
with Leicester University but is not offering this test to soldiers from
the 2003 conflict. Instead it will only be made available to veterans
of the 1991 Gulf War.
Given the very real risk to
all soldiers and the necessity of testing all returning soldiers it must
be asked why continue to use these weapons at all?
Korean
Island Bombed with DU
The Maehyang-ri bombing range,
based on an island off South Korea, fires daily at the tiny surrounding
islands with fighter jets, including the DU-firing A-10. Communities who
live less than a mile away have had their lands taken and are now facing
toxic pollution. The villagers live by fishing and clam fishing but environmental
studies of the area have found the shellfish to be severely contaminated.
Villagers have also been hit by shells, with at least 12 killed. Thousands
of shells have gone off target and lodged in the hillsides around the
area. One entire island has already been wipe out while another two mile
long island has been reduced to two-thirds its original size.
But the Maehyang-ri bombing
range isn't run by the US Air Force and it isn't run by the US Army. Five
years ago, the bombing range was privatized and turned over to the multinational
weapons contractor Lockheed Martin. Then, in July, the bombing range changed
hands. An Alaska-based company called Arctic Slope World Service took
over the contract.
28
Anti-DU Protestors Found Not Guilty
On Friday, October 17, 2003,
a six-person jury of citizens from Hennepin County declared that International
Law can trump the local private property/no trespass law. At the height
of the recent war against Iraq, on April 2, 2003, 28 Minnesotans "crossed
the line," entering the world headquarters property of Alliant TechSystems
Corporation in Edina with the express purpose of conducting a "Citizens'
Weapons Inspection."
The letter they carried demanded
that they have access to the books and records of Alliant TechSystems
Corporation (ATK) to see if they had completed any studies on the medical
and environmental effects of the DU uranium munitions they produce. The
defendants contended that there is significant evidence that the DU munitions
produced by ATK containing U-238, a radioactive substance with a half-life
of 4.5 billion years, is a prime suspect in escalating rates of cancers
and birth defects among residents of southern Iraq and US troops who served
in the first Gulf War. On April 2, 2003, 28 activists crossed the line
and entered Alliant TechSystems. On October 17, 2003 a public trial was
held and all 28 were found not guilty.
Australia
To Buy US DU Tank
Australia is set to buy 60
Abrams M1 battle tanks from the US for $600 million. Although modifications
are being made for the Australians, like replacing the DU armour with
ceramic plate, the Abrams tank still fires DU munitions. The choice of
the tank is to strengthen the alliance with the US by boosting "interoperability"
for future Iraq-style conflicts. In an indication of the strategic importance
of the move, the US Administration will handle the deal, selling the tanks
directly to Australia. Critics say the Abrams are unsuitable as they are
too heavy to be airlifted and deployed easily.
Australia has never used its previous 30 year old tank fleet.
World
Uranium Weapons Conference
Rae Street of CADU talking at the World
Uranium Weapons Conference
From October 16th-19th the
World Uranium Weapons Conference was held in Hamburg Germany. A mixture
of activists, scientists and veterans came to the conference from all
over the world, including two scientists from Iraq. Images and documents
from the conference can be viewed at:
http://traprockpeace.org/du_hamburg_03
ATSDR
Study Finds DU Site Could Have Caused Lung Cancer and Kidney Disease
The Agency for Toxic Substances
and Disease Registry (ATSDR), has released a study of past emissions from
the Colonie Site (formerly National Lead Inc.) in Albany, N.Y. In the
study they found that "After evaluating the environmental data, ATSDR
concluded that past DU emissions from the plant were a public health hazard
and may possibly have increased the risk of kidney disease and lung cancer,
particularly for smokers who had lived near the plant. The extent to which
risk was increased, however, is unknown."
Residents near the plant however
are not satisfied with the study (which took 10 years to achieve) and
are considering bringing a class action lawsuit against National Lead's
successor company, Houston, Texas-based 'NL Industries Inc.' They claim
the study is full of omissions in data and inconsistencies and that several
serious areas such as the risk to children from contaminated soil have
been overlooked or dismissed. More than 89 residents have signed a petition
demanding "a comprehensive health study of the community impacted
by NL Industries pollution, with input from a community-appointed Citizen
Advisory Committee." They claim strong incidences of cancer and other
diseases occur around the plant.
Cleanup
of DU in Serbia Gets Under Way
A site contaminated with DU
in the 1999 bombing of Serbia has been decontaminated. The Serbian Government
claims that the cleanup at Bratoselce has been 95% effective. It has cost
the Serbian government 15 million dinars. Given that under International
Law weapons should not continue to have effect after the war has ended,
it is a shame that a poor country should have to pay so much money to
cleanup the mess left behind by rich NATO armies. Meanwhile more than
200 DU rounds have been found in a site near Presevo in Southern Serbia...
Truck
carrying DU Overturns
While the Department of Defence
continues to insist that there is no need to label transport carrying
DU, a road in Montana, USA, was closed when a truck carrying uranium hexafluoride
was found to have overturned. Authorities reopened the road some hours
later after determining there was no leakage.
MoD
Denies it is to Phase-out DU Weapons
An article in the Telegraph (21/09/2003) that the UK Government was planning
to phaseout DU tank rounds caused some excitement but proved to be a bit
premature. In a reply to a member of the public the MoD said ". This
article is not entirely accurate. .. To date DU has consistently out performed
all equivalents as a kinetic penetrator when employed in anti-armour weapon
systems: its use, therefore, offers the best operational effectiveness
in this role."
Japanese
Government Doesn't Even Know If It Is Risking its Troops to DU Exposure
In reply to questions asked
in the Japanese Parliament, the Japanese Government admitted that it did
not know if DU was used there by the US army, despite this being widely
publicised. One of the sites Japanese troops may be sent to, Samawah,
is believed to have been widely contaminated.
US
Government and Military Trying to Wriggle Out of DU Cleanup at National
Sites
The US Government and military
is trying to walk away from its commitments to cleanup sites contaminated
by DU and other radioactive materials at the Jefferson Proving Ground
(JPG), Indiana and Hanford, Washington. The army initially has a decommissioning
plan for JPG but now is saying that because of unexploded ordnance, it
is too dangerous to send Army workers into the area for decommissioning.
However environmental group 'Save the Valley' have put in a hearing request
that the regulations governing decommissioning do not provide for an open-ended
license with no timetable for decommissioning. If the Army is allowed
to not have a plan in place, a precedent could be set for how the same
issue is handled at other bases. At Hanford the Department of Energy is
attempting to avoid cleanup by redefining more than 3/4 of its most dangerous
radioactive wastes as 'incidental'.
British
Government Says No Central Register of DU in Iraq Kept
In response to written questions
in parliament asked by Angus Robertson MP to the Secretary of State for
Defence about British DU deployment, location and recovery in Iraq, he
replied "I am withholding information about numbers of rounds of
DU munitions deployed on operations (in Iraq)... All surplus DU ammunition
has now been returned to the UK. Obvious surface-lying DU fragments continue
to be removed from the battlefield as they are discovered, however the
details of DU findings are not held centrally."
Summary
Of Scientific Papers on DU
Prof. Glen Lawrence of Long
Island University has prepared summaries of many of the scientific papers
written on the health effects of DU. Although written primarily for those
with some scientific understanding it is very useful for anyone doing
research in this area or interested in finding out more on the subject.
Please contact CADU if you would like a copy of his work in email or paper
form.
Message
from CADU to All Our Supporters
Message
from CADU to All Our Supporters
CADU would like to thank all
subscribers for their support. We have a bank of resources, including
exhibitions and leaflets so do give us a call if you want materials or
a speaker. We send seasonal greetings and best wishes for the New Year.
Never has peace been so linked to social justice.
Subscribe to CADU News - by affiliating to CADU
Affiliation rates (including a paper copy of CADU News four times a year)
are £8 per year (unwaged/student) £10 per year (waged) and
£30 (groups), but please consider donating more than this if possible.
Please send a cheque or a request for a standing order to:
CADU, Bridge 5 Mill, 22a Beswick St, Manchester M4 7HR
|