Introduction | News
| Information | Resources
| Affiliate | Action
| Links | Contact
CADU NEWS 3
Winter 1999/2000
Contents
1) Stanstead Air Crash Involved DU
2) Dutch Crash 1992
3) NGO Committee on Disarmament in US
4) Gulf Veterans present evidence to Defence Committee
5) DU Contaminated with Plutonium and Neptunium
6) DU Action at UN
7) National March and Demonstration for Gulf War Veteran Saturday 26 February
8) From Puerto Rico to Scotland - DU campaigners chase DU across Atlantic
9) Report from Ban-DU, a US partner to CADU
10) More News from the US
11) Uranium Hexafluoride, Recycling and US Workers Health
12) Jury backs campaigner's anti-DU graffiti
13) Iraq has DU
14) Day for the People of Iraq 1 April 2000
15) Report on the Fire and Royal Ordnance Speciality Metals
16) Dan Fahey's Policy Paper on DU
17) Committee for Peace in the Balkans - Conference
18) The Royal Society Investigation - 'not so independent'
19) Web site to look at
20) CADU Website
21) CADU Display for 'hire'
22) Balkans Update
23) Proposed CADU International Conference 1st- 2nd July 2000 Manchester
England
24) Videos Available
25) What is CADU?
26) Current UK government position on DU
_________________________________________________________
Stanstead Air Crash Involved DU
The Korean Air Boeing 747 which crashed near Stansted Airport just before
Christmas was later revealed to have been carrying depleted uranium.
DU is used in aircraft as counter-weights for tail rudder controls because
the of high density which gives a heavy weight in only a small size. Several
hundred kilograms of DU were used in 747 Jumbo Jets until the 1980s when
it was replaced with tungsten.
A Boeing spokesperson commented in the Guardian newspaper that it would
not have presented any risk to the public or to emergency workers, "The
company began using DU in the early 1960s. Boeing replaced it with tungsten
in the early 1980s, on grounds of cost and availability. The Korean 747
was delivered to the airline in June 1980. We think it contained about
300 kg of DU. But it would need to have been exposed to a fire of 800
degrees Celsius for more than four hours before it emitted uranium oxide.
And even then, if it was breathed in it would be only 40% of the amount
deemed harmful."
This is a startling remark, as in effect, for the first time, officials
are admitting that DU is dangerous in weapons, when it does indeed burn
above these temperatures.
Since this time, it has been revealed by the Department of Environment
and Transport that only about half of the DU used in the jet has been
recovered by contractors working to clear the site for investigators.
It is therefore possible that some of the uranium was vaporised in the
intense
fire when the aircraft crashed and this could raise worrying concerns
about health effects. In a similar plane disaster in 1992, an El Al Boeing
747 crashed in suburbs of Amsterdam and burst into flames. Poisoning from
the DU has been partly blamed for a number of illnesses which have been
suffered by those living near the crash site (see below).
Malcolm Hooper, professor emeritus of medicinal chemistry at the University
of Sunderland told BBC News Online: "If no precautions were taken at the
crash scene, people will have been exposed to hazards that could prove
fatal."
The Korean Air jet crashed in flames and Professor Hooper said: "Those
who were handling the wreckage should have been advised of the risk. They
should have been taking all the precautions they didn't take in the Amsterdam
crash. "I can't see any way you could have a significant fire in a crash
like this without producing the conditions that would allow a potentially
hazardous release of DU."
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Dutch crash 1992
On 4 October 1992 an El Al cargo 747 crashed into a block of flats in
Bijlmermeer, an Amsterdam suburb, killing 43 people. In recent years questions
have remained about the cause of the crash, health problems among citizens
and rescue workers, the exact cargo, depleted uranium counterweights and
other issues. More than 800 residents and rescue workers were reported
after the crash to be complaining of a range of problems, including fatigue,
skin complaints, joint and bone pains, kidney ailments and respiratory
problems. The LAKA foundation in Holland (with whom CADU has strong links)
made public the fact that the plane had been carrying 282 kg of DU counterweights.
Only 130 kg were recovered in the clear-up after the crash, and LAKA pointed
out emphatically that the airborne oxidised uranium posed health risks.
Paul Loewenstein, once technical director and vice-president of a company
now called Starmet suppliers of DU to Boeing, produced an article which
said "large pieces of uranium will oxidise rapidly and will sustain slow
combustion when heated in air to temperatures of about 500 degrees Celsius."
The health risks associated with this have been detailed in these pages
before. Basing their evidence on NASA tests showing that the temperature
of a fireball in a plane crash can reach 1,200 C, and the weather conditions
on the day, LAKA suggested that DU could have spread in dust clouds from
the crash.
In a press release issued on the day news of DU involvement in the crash
was exposed, radiation experts claimed there was no risk to public health
as the DU remained intact. A report by the local council also claimed
that there was little risk.
However, since this time, LAKA have continued to fight their conclusions,
producing more and more evidence to suggest that the DU did pose health
concerns. The ongoing publications and rumours sparked a Parliamentarian
Inquiry Commission into the disaster in 1998. During this it emerged that
the Dutch Aviation Administration found DU weights on the third day after
the crash but failed to inform rescue workers.
After repeated claims about DU burning, the Minister of Traffic announced
new research on this matter. The outcome, largely based on US Army Research,
confirmed the possibility of low temperature burning. Between 350 and
600 C DU will oxidise and be loosened as fine powder. Between 650 to 800
C the formed oxides mainly stuck to the weight, but a higher temperatures
the counterweights would oxidise completely. This research is significant
for the recent Stansted crash. The final conclusion of the Commission,
which was far from satisfactory in LAKA's view, was: "based on existing
scientific literature, research on the Bijlmer crash, its hearings, and
own research that it is unlikely that big groups of citizens and rescue
workers have contracted uranium poisoning" But "The Commission explicitly
states that it cannot be excluded that in specific circumstances, some
individuals have inhaled that much respirable uranium oxide particles
that a contamination has taken place"
Taken from 'Uranium Pollution from the Amsterdam 1992 Plane Crash" an
article by Henk Van der Keur, Laka Foundation in 'Depleted Uranium - A
post war disaster for environment and health'
Contact: [email protected]
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
NGO Committee on Disarmament in US
On October 26th, 1999, the NGO Committee on Disarmament hosted a panel
discussion on depleted uranium weapons at the United Nations in New York.
The Pentagon was well represented. They sent what they thought was a "Trojan
Horse" in the form of Colonel Eric Daxon from the Army Medical Corps,
but by the end of the night, he looked more like a sacrificial lamb.
Since the Pentagon admitted, in 1998, that "thousands" of Gulf War veterans
may have been exposed to depleted uranium, Pentagon spokesmen have dropped
back to their next line of defence; not one veteran was exposed to enough
DU to cause any health problems. Of course, using such a definitive statement
is problematic and indefensible, especially when you have no data to support
your position. The Pentagon is enamoured with DU and its refusal to admit
any adverse effects from its use had prevented veterans from getting health
care and forestalled research on DU's health and environmental effects.
Overall the Pentagon came off looking extremely arrogant and lacking credibility.
After Colonel Daxon admitted people should stay away from equipment hit
by DU rounds, a journalist asked why the Department of Defence had still
not passed this warning on to Kosov@ civilians. "Ask NATO," the Colonel
responded tersely, to which the journalist stated "NATO won't answer that
question either. " Unfortunately for the Pentagon, 60 Minutes taped the
entire debate.
By Dan Fahey (in Veterans for Peace Newsletter, Nov 99)
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Gulf Veterans Present Evidence to Defence Committee
At the end of last year, the parliamentary Defence Committee considered
the role of depleted uranium and Gulf War Syndrome. The National Association
of Gulf War Veterans presented oral evidence to the committee, flying
in Dr Hari Sharma of Waterloo University in Canada, and Doug Rokke from
Pentonville University, to present expert opinion. Professor Malcolm Hooper
from the UK was also present to give evidence. All three experts were
adamant and unequivocal that British vets had tested positive for depleted
uranium.
Doug Rokke told the Committee that in his previous position, giving advice
to the Pentagon, he was the officer tasked to clean up vehicles hit with
DU in the Gulf War, and to provide a future protocol for this task. He
made 4 training videos,
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
DU Contaminated with Plutonium and Neptunium
The uranium hexafluoride that the US government store at Paducah, Kentucky
could be contaminated with Plutonium and Neptunium. This could be the
most worrying problem to date. Plutonium and Neptunium and 'Transuranics,'
that is they are larger in atomic number that uranium. All transuranics
are very radioactive and very dangerous even in small quantities.
This is the same stockpile that the Department of Energy plans to give
away for commercial uses, including depleted uranium ammunition.
More details at http://www.eh.doe.gov/oversight/paducah/pad_ph1.pdf
Clare Frisby
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
DU Action at the UN
CADU has agreed to publicise and circulate a report written by Karen
Parker, which analyses DU action at the UN. In summarising this report
Karen writes: "I will include all DU groups NGO statements (written and
oral), my Memorandum, the UN resolutions and report and an update of the
current status. The analysis will include discussion of the "whys" behind
the UN action and my legal position that DU is already illegal by operation
of existing law. I will include some discussion of why lobbying for a
specific treaty banning DU could be counterproductive as well as costly.
While I intend to have the report done by February -- in time for the
next session of the Commission on Human Rights -- the next big push on
the issue will be the Summer session of the Sub-Commission. In the meantime
if there are any questions please don't hesitate to contact me.
Karen Parker <[email protected]>
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
National March and Demonstration for Gulf War Veterans
Saturday 26th February. Meet at Tothill St at 11.30 for noon.
The march will pass St Pauls where it will visit the Memorial to the Gulf
War veterans in the crypt. At 4pm representatives will hand in a petition
to Downing Street demanding a public enquiry (again) into why over 400
veterans have died since their return, why over 5,000 veterans are reported
ill, and why over 1000 children are suffering from illnesses related to
their parents gulf service. The publicity for the march states "You do
not have to be a Gulf War Veteran; families, friends and supporters are
welcome, you just need to be someone who believes in what is right and
wants the truth to be told."
For more information contact Terry Gooding (Gulf Veterans Assoc. - 22
Glencoul Avenue, Dalgety Bay, Fife, Scotland 01383 823528, or Julie Means
01462 620134
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
From Puerto Rico to Scotland - DU Campaigners chase DU
across Atlantic
The US Navy tested munitions on the island of Vieques in Puerto Rico
for 50 years. Locals began a vociferous protest after a civilian was killed
in an accident on the Vieques firing range and are currently camped out
as human shields to prevent resumption of munitions testing there. Through
this protest campaign they found out that the navy had tested DU there.
Initially the Navy claimed it was a mistake.
Weapons tested at Vieques contained heavy metals and other toxic elements
including napalm as well as DU. People live so close to the firing ranges
that dust from explosions can blow onto their farm land, houses and gardens.
There has been no proper environmental monitoring by the US navy or the
Puerto Rican government. Locals believe that DU is giving people cancer
and other illness and are now trying to sue the US Navy for clean up costs
and compensation. The US Navy have now (temporarily) ceased the testing
due to the protests, but have failed to clear-up as yet.
Now the US Navy are proposing to test their weapons at Cape Wrath, Scotland.
The MoD deny granting permission to use the site for DU testing. The US
Navy deny planning to test DU there. Are they to be believed? The US Navy
covered up the use of DU in Puerto Rico. Will they do it again in Scotland?
Three ships from the American fleet are due to arrive there in March to
conduct live firing exercises
In response to this the MP Alisdair Morgan, has tabled a parliamentary
question asking whether the US has been given permission to use Cape Wrath
to test munitions and whether this includes DU.
Protesters from Puerto Rico are going to set up camp at a village near
Cape Wrath. Locals are not, according to the Sunday herald of 30 January
2000, opposing the planned munitions testing. Puerto Rican protesters
plan to warn locals about what they might have in store.
For information about the Puerto Rican protest please visit their web
site: http://www.viequeslibre.org
Comment:
If testing DU weapons poses no threat to locals why don't the US Navy
do it in the United States?
The US military produced safety videos on how to handle DU munitions and
clear up after firing. If it was safe to walk around a site that has been
used to test DU shells then the military would not have made these videos.
There will be debate about exactly what is causing the high cancer rate
in Vieques. The bottom line is that it is unacceptable to expose people
to DU. We should class DU as nuclear waste and treat it as such. However,
it will probably remain impossible to work out what has caused whose asthma,
cancer or kidney failure. It is dangerous to wait for absolute evidence
of harm before acting. There is a suspected potential for DU to cause
cancers and other illnesses. It would be imprudent to ignore such warnings.
Clare Frisby
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Report from Ban-DU, a U.S. partner to CADU
We continue to work hard to spread the word about the deadly effects
of depleted uranium, to civilian populations as well as service personnel
who suffer its consequences. We have made posters of colour photos of
a few of the deformed and dying children in Iraq (5,000 a month), due
to Sanctions and DU exposure. We have displayed them in several public
locations. Along with the posters we offer a brochure to help educate
the public. It includes action ideas and addresses of officials who could
influence public policy. We are angry that our military is so obsessed
with power that they refuse to acknowledge the damage to health to civilians
as well as our military personnel. We have had considerable (unsatisfactory)
correspondence with top officials in the Pentagon, other government agencies
and veterans' associations. We have urged many of the popular TV talk
shows to cover this topic, so far with no results. But we keep trying.
Thanks to the behind-the-scenes guidance of Dan Fahey (Military Toxics
Project), an amazingly accurate coverage of DU was put on national TV
(Sixty Minutes) in December 1999, watched by 80 million Americans. The
program covered how much the military knew about DU's toxic effects before
it was used in battle (in Iraq), and how little they warned or protected
service personnel, even afterwards, during the pathetically little cleanup.
The Pentagon followed the program with its PR machine telling that their
studies show no significant health effects could result from its use.
No public outcry has resulted, either due to the effectiveness of the
Pentagon whitewash, or else the public is numb from too many recent revelations
of wrong-doings.
We listened to the same denials and rhetoric for 25 years about agent
orange. Now we learn of radiation experiments on civilians (without their
knowledge) that occurred back in the 1960's, and of experimental bacteriological
gases and sprays used on selected civilian populations... What more has
the military done that we don't know about? We have come to know that
our governments will do anything to enhance their desperate need to make
deadly and deadlier weapons of destruction. It is the power thing as well
as a profitable product to sell all over the world. How sad.
We are angry that our young men and women in uniform are constantly being
used as guinea pigs, not only with DU, but being fed irradiated food,
and given experimental immunisations, and who knows what else?
We continue to urge our government to halt the use of DU weapons (and
take out of service those already made), to stop selling DU weapons or
DU for commercial use to other countries (and reclaim that which we have
already sold abroad), to clean up the contamination of DU weapons everywhere
we have imposed it (testing as well as battle sites), to provide appropriate
medical care for those who have been affected, to prohibit any further
use of DU for commercial, civilian products and reclaim those already
in use. Share with us your success stories on how you are getting this
story out!
We are impressed with your gains with your MP's, and your hearings at
the United Nations. Keep up your great work!!
Betty Schroeder
Ban-DU
5349 W. Bar X Street
Tucson, AZ 85713
USA
[email protected]
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
More News from the US
In Tennessee: DU munitions workers who went out on strike in 1981 due
to high levels of DU dust in the workplace finally won their case in court.
A September 1999 decision acknowledged the workers' right to strike, and
ordered Aerojet Corp. (formerly TNS) to hire the workers back and recompense
them for lost wages.
In Concord, MA: The cleanup of depleted uranium at the Starmet (formerly
Nuclear Metals) ammunition plant stopped last spring after $6 million
was spent. Starmet, the state, and the federal government are arguing
over who will pay up to $50 million to complete the cleanup of depleted
uranium at the site.
In Washington, DC: A November 1999 conference hosted by the Armed Forces
Radiobiology Research Institute discussed current federal research on
DU. Researchers recommended further investigation of the relationship
between DU and cancer, immune system and neurological problems, and male
and female reproductive effects. The Institute of Medicine is currently
reviewing DU research to determine what health effects, if any, may be
related to Gulf War veterans' illnesses.
In the News: Television shows on depleted uranium have recently aired
on national television in Canada (Sept. 1999), Japan (Nov. 1999), the
United States (Dec. 1999), and France (Jan. 1999). After the US show "60
Minutes" aired a segment on DU and the Gulf War, Pentagon spokesmen reiterated
their assertion that it is impossible any veterans could be sick from
depleted uranium.
Dan Fahey (Military Toxics Project PO Box 21309, Washington, DC 20009,
202 232 1880 [email protected]
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Uranium Hexafluoride, Recycling and US Workers' Health
UF6 is the chemical symbol for uranium hexafluoride. Scientists sometimes
refer to it as DUF6.
To produce enriched uranium, one must first convert it into UF6. It is
a part of the enrichment process. Gaseous diffusion, the process used
to extract enriched uranium from UF6, produces four tonnes of depleted
uranium for every tonne of enriched uranium. Therefore DUF6 constitutes
a huge proportion of the United States' nuclear waste: France stores its
waste in a different form. (I have been unable to find out in what form
the UK stores its DU) It is unstable and difficult and expensive to store,
posing a threat to workers and the surrounding environment. The DU used
in munitions in Iraq and the Gulf War came from this source.
In the United States the government have come up with a proposal to process
DUF6 back into uranium metal and use it in industry - as counterweights
in lifts and fork lift trucks for example. In July 1988, President Clinton
signed the 'Uranium Recycling Bill'. It provides $400 million to the UF6
storage plants in Ohio and Kentucky to treat and recycle UF6. Construction
is due to start in January 2000. Industry has already used DU for ballast
in aeroplane wings and in ships. It is possible that these products could
be arriving in the UK without any clear labelling.
The use of DU in ordinary industrial machinery could have more far reaching
effects than the use of DU in munitions. However, the problems associated
with the use of DU in munitions remain. IEER in the United States have
some practicable proposals for storage of UF6. They suggest ways to make
it safe in terms of proliferation: for example, processing it in such
a way that it would be difficult to enrich for use in power stations or
nuclear weapons.
They also suggest ways to store it safely.
Watch this space for further developments.
Clare Frisby
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Jury backs campaigner's anti-DU graffiti
Helen John, an anti-nuclear campaigner who daubed 'Ban Depleted Uranium'
graffiti on the House of Commons was found guilty last December of criminal
damage. But the jury handed the judge a note condoning the actions of
the 62-year-old former Greenham Common protester.
Judge Blacksell QC, read the note which said 'We are unanimously agreed
that the defendant had reasonable cause for her actions'. He told the
jurors: You can take it I can understand that ... and will be true to
it.
At one point, the jury asked the judge if they could consider international
law when delivering their verdict, but were instructed to the contrary.
Sentence was deferred sentence for six months.
Helen had daubed 18-inch high messages 'No star wars', 'Ban trident' and
'Ban depleted uranium' at St Stephen's Gate, the public entrance to the
Palace of Westminster, early one morning in September. Apparently despite
a £4,500 clean up, the ghost of the slogans may remain for a long time
- continuing to inform people of the persistent threats these weapons
pose.
MP's give evidence
Tony Benn gave evidence to support Ms John during the trial telling the
jury he had been misled or kept in the dark on a number of nuclear issues
while a government minister. He agreed that action such as hers was sometimes
necessary to alert parliament and the public about what was really going
on. "I think dissent and protest of a non-violent kind are an integral
part of democracy", Mr Benn said. He also testified that the British Government,
with its repeated flouting of international law, was a threat to democracy.
Excellent expert witness was also given by MP Alan Simpson who told the
court that it was well nigh impossible to get information out of the MoD,
even when large spending on projects was involved.
Ms John has been a dedicated anti-nuclear campaigner for many years. She
set up the Menwith camp five years ago at Menwith Hill, the biggest US
spy base in the world, and renamed the base WoMenwith Hill.
"Unusual" verdict
A spokesman for the lord chancellor's department said it was highly unusual
for a jury to convict a defendant, then subsequently condone their actions,
but he was unable to say whether the case had set a legal precedent.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Iraq has DU
In January, the International Atomic Energy Agency Inspectors conducted
nuclear materials inspections in Iraq. They stated in a press release
that although weapon-usable nuclear material (plutonium and high enriched
uranium) has been removed from Iraq, the country has still about 1.8 tonnes
of low enriched uranium (2.6%) as well as several tonnes of natural and
depleted uranium.
As Rosalie Bertell commented "It might be very important to find out the
plans of the IAEA with respect to the DU and other radioactive waste which
remains in Iraq. If the West is calling DU ammunition conventional, they
will not be able to condem Iraq for using it."
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Day for the People of Iraq
1 April 2000
Camden Centre, Euston Road, London
The Mariam Appeal are organising a day school for the people
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Report on the Fire at Royal Ordnance Special Metals
On 8th February 1999 a serious fire broke out at Royal Ordnance Speciality
Metals at Featherstone near Wolverhampton, when a piece of depleted uranium
swarf ignited mineral oil, and the resulting running fluid fire spread
to 200-300 wooden pallets stored nearby. The fire burned out of control
for hours and dense clouds of smoke rose high into the sky. DU is both
toxic and radioactive. Yet all official statements, both at the time and
subsequently, insist that there was no risk to fire fighters or the public,
and that only very slight traces of DU contamination were detected within
the building and where fire crews gained access. This is in dramatic contrast
with Environment Agency evidence about DU given in a successful prosecution
(29.11.99) at Hemel Hempstead of Jenny Seward, a company director involved
in illegal dumping. Regarding fire during machining operations, the Case
Summary states, "Any fire so created would produce radioactive particles
of uranium oxide which would be inhaled by anyone exposed to the smoke
from the fire thus exposed to the risks of cancer described above"
Main issues of concern
There seems to be no single body responsible for pulling together all
the facts: there was no requirement for an emergency plan for the site.
The Environment Agency (EA) has produced a public report only 2 sides
long, the Staffordshire Fire and Rescue Service has written an internal
report for its own purposes, and the NRPB is producing a report which
can be released only by permission of Royal Ordnance Speciality Metals,
(ROSM). ROSM's own report will not be made public. The Health & Safety
Executive report is not complete yet.
In April the Dr Othen for the EA said that they assumed that, "When the
facility is decontaminated and reconstructed ROSM will wish to resume
business". He indicated that the Agency is in a difficult situation because
of the national security aspect of work at ROSM and that he saw no ground
for removing ROSM's licences. However: A condition of operation is that
Depleted Uranium (DU) is kept away from flammable materials. It seems
clear that ROSM breached its licence by storing 200-300 wooden pallets
near to the machine where the fire started. The fact that DU swarf fell
outside the mineral oil bath would suggest unsatisfactory practices in
the machine room. The fact that burning DU ignited the oil, thus causing
a running fluid fire, which spread to the pallets in the adjoining area,
again indicates that safety precautions were not adequate. Powder specifically
for extinguishing DU fires was stored in wheelbarrows at the far end of
the machine room, in an area which the firemen could not reach, because
of the fire! Again, this would seem to indicate totally unacceptable work
practices.
At present, despite widespread inquiries, and information from fire-fighters,
it is not possible to make a clear summary of the various tests for radiation
which were conducted. Bodies involved were the Environment Agency from
Lichfield (Graham Macro), the NRPB from Leeds, and the County Analyst
at the request of the fire fighters. Although the Environment Agency claims
that Mr. Macro was on site at 11.30 (i.e. within 45 minutes of the alarm),
and allegedly started "preliminary monitoring", and although the Agency's
public report (30.3.99) says that he "liaised with Emergency Services",
this sits oddly alongside the evidence of fire fighters, as given in their
internal report. This describes fire fighters, concerned about a possible
radioactive release, attempting to access the Company Contamination meter
at 11.34, but being "summoned out due to deteriorating situation."
Their concerns remained, and after repeated requests for help & information
re. radioactive contamination, at 12.50 they requested the attendance
of the County Analyst with monitoring equipment. He was instructed to
test for gamma (NB not all that relevant in the case of DU) radiation.
Fire control was notified at 13.58 that testing has finally taken place.
It is still not clear how many sets of tests were taken, and at what time.
As all accounts have the fire originating with burning DU swarf, it seems
incontestable that some radiation must have been given off during the
early stages of combustion. WHY were early contamination
checks not made?
Another area which is not clear is how much DU was actually involved in
the fire. The Fire Brigade Report has Mr. Macro telling a meeting of West
Midlands Regional Advisory Committee on Incidents Involving Radiation
(10.2.99) that "approximately 10% of the 200-500 kg of DU could have been
released in the fire..".
The "national security" aspect of ROSM's work is presumably the cause
of Mr. Macro's coyness about quantities. A further complication in trying
to find any agency which puts the public's safety as top priority is the
fact that the NRPB (letter to me 19.4.99) is under contract to ROSM ,"and
any findings are strictly their property." We really have to wonder whether
there is information, release of which ROSM has vetoed.
Increasingly concerned about possible health effects from working next
to ROSM, officers from Featherstone prison sent urine and soil samples
for analysis to Dr. Hari Sharma at Waterloo University Canada. Before
these samples arrived, and just before he was to give an interview to
Mike Nicholson of ITN, Dr. Sharma was relieved of his university post,
after 30 years. The prison officers' samples have disappeared.
For further information contact : Madeline Haigh of West Midlands CND
on 0121 329 3252
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Dan Fahey's Policy Paper on DU
Dan Fahey from the Military Toxics Project (a partner of CADU in the
US) has written an excellent policy paper on DU. The paper includes an
overview of the current situation in relation to the use of DU and its
potential health effects. It goes on to outline approaches to the problem
- health and safety, scientific, legal, economic, human rights, and military
necessity. He explores alternatives to DU, and assesses the impediments
to getting rid of DU. IN conclusion, he offers a proposed solution which
involves more medical and scientific research, and meanwhile, international
courts should hold those who use DU accountable for failing to protect
soldiers and civilians from exposure. Attempts should be made to persuade
governments to abandon use of DU in munitions in favour of alternatives.
The complete paper is available from the CADU office and maybe a useful
summary and campaigning tool - please ask and we can send or e-mail it
to you.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Committee for Peace in the Balkans Conference
The Manchester Committee for Peace in the Balkans organised a conference
on the NATO bombing of Yugoslavia which was held at the Friends Meeting
House on 4 December. The plenary sessions featured speakers analysing
various aspects of the global political causes and consequences of the
bombing. Workshop session included information on NATO's economic war,
NATO's humanitarian war, NATOs media war and NATO's environmental war.
One very important message was the resistance we must all make to the
government's and media's demonisation of the Serb people. Obviously this
goes for the Iraqi people as well. Nobody thinks the leadership of those
two countries is composed of saints, but we should make every effort to
resist the demonisation and accompanying economic deprivation imposed
on the people, which results not only in severe hardship but deprivations
resulting in the death in Iraq of 6,000 children per month. The so-called
"smart sanctions" in Yugoslavia - targeted only at those cities which
have not withdrawn support from the government - not only assume a degree
of agency which may not exist, but may also serve to mask the health effects
of the chemical and radiological pollutants released during the bombing.
I gave the workshop on DU, in the "Environmental war" section. This was
well-received, and several useful contacts were made. One item mentioned
was the negative effect of the 1959 agreement between the International
Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA) and the World Health Organisation (WHO).
This agreement includes clauses that limit WHO's ability to properly research
the health effects of exposure to low-level radiation, and may be one
root of the secrecy and cover ups which have been the hallmark of the
nuclear age. Since the IAEA is also charged with promoting the nuclear
industry, giving it any control whatsoever over scientific enquiry into
the negative effects of the industry is rather like getting the fox to
guard the chickens. The Women's International League for Peace and Freedom
is circulating a petition to have the agreement amended. Copies of the
petition may be obtained from WILPF member Helen John, 26 The Oval, Otley
LS21 2ED (Tel. 01943-468593), or CADU office.
Cat Euler
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
The Royal Society Investigation - 'not so independent'
The new Royal Society team that has been given the mandate to carry out
an "independent" investigation of the health risks and effects of DU is
faced with a critical challenge. Robert Fisk and others have already questioned
the team's purported independence, as well we might, considering that
several scientists on the team have known links to the nuclear industry.
The nuclear industry has a vested interest in downplaying the dangers
of DU in order to expand the commercial and military market for "low-level"
radioactive metals.
The Royal Society's primary challenge will be to carry out a truly scientific
investigation. It should be based on material measurements, not just theory.
It should not just re-hash the pro-nuclear literature, as the RAND report
did. The main argument of the US DoD and UK MoD boils down to some version
of "the radioactivity is too low to cause health consequences, therefore
there are no health consequences."
This assumption appears to be based on an outdated reliance on the questionable
data on dose-effect relationships which has come out of the studies on
the survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. These people were suddenly exposed
to large amounts of radionuclides; when scientists came to estimate the
dose people had received, these measurements were restricted to external
exposures. In the case of DU, we are dealing with long-term exposures
to relatively low-levels of radionuclides which can be ingested and inhaled,
and re-ingested and re-inhaled, over a period of time which is, essentially,
eternity.
Rather than rely unscientifically on previous literature which does not
focus on the particular toxicology of the particular chemical forms found
after the firing of DU on a battlefield, the Royal Society team needs
to carry out primary research. Rather than trying to "allay the veterans'
fears", as Chairman Brian Spratt said on Radio 4, the team should be working
to test the urine of as many veterans and other exposed people as soon
as possible. These measurements need to be repeated at intervals of six
months, so that the real rate of elimination can be ascertained. Once
this is known, it will be possible to work backwards to find out the estimated
exposure based on real numbers, not guesses, useful as these may be for
speculation's sake. These tests should not be performed simply for the
sake of research, but to assist in the process of guaranteeing life-time
full health care for all those exposed.
Cat Euler
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Website to Look At
http://www.antenna.nl/wise/uranium/rup.html#REF
This is a wonderful explanation of the additional radioactivity which
should be calculated into the individual dose if the DU has come from
reprocessed spent fuel rather than from the beginning of the nuclear cycle.
Maybe people who read the newsletter might want to look it up if they
want more technical information??
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
CADU Website
We have needed to create a Website for CADU since the beginning, as it
is an essential tool in this day and age for campaigners. Now, we are
finally in the process of setting one up, which will not only provide
all the latest material, but will link to other Website on DU and related
issues around the world. At the time of going to print, we do not have
the address for the Website, but we hope to have it up and running by
early March. The address will be in the next edition of CADU news, or
if you can't wait, try typing depleted uranium in a search and we hope
we'll crop up.
CADU display for 'hire'
We now have an exhibition, on CADU and the issue of depleted uranium,
available for use by groups and individuals. It is in full colour, and
consists of one A1 and six A2 laminated panels, which can be pinned or
velcroed on most display boards/walls. We will also have a black and white
copy (which is still excellent quality) also available. Groups may use
this display for the cost of posting or otherwise transporting the display
to you. It has appeared in Manchester Central Library, and we encourage
other groups to try to arrange to have the display in their local libraries,
schools, town halls, community centres etc.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
CADU Display for 'Hire'
We now have an exhibition, on CADU and the issue of depleted uranium,
available for use by groups and individuals. It is in full colour, and
consists of one A1 and six A2 laminated panels, which can be pinned or
velcroed on most display boards/walls. We will also have a black and white
copy (which is still excellent quality) also available. Groups may use
this display for the cost of posting or otherwise transporting the display
to you. It has appeared in Manchester Central Library, and we encourage
other groups to try to arrange to have the display in their local libraries,
schools, town halls, community centres etc.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Balkans Update
We have received many enquiries from concerned groups and individuals
regarding the use of DU in the Balkans, not least from returning refugees
and aid workers, desperate to know where DU was used. Unfortunately this
information is not being released by the US DoD, and it is impossible
to offer much help to these people. We have however printed two leaflets
on precautionary measures to take in areas where DU may have been used
(produced by Cat Euler). We are also funding a similar leaflet in Serbian,
to be distributed by a local group. If anyone would like copies of this
leaflet, please contact the office.
What you can do:
Please write to your MP to ask the government to pressure the US to release
its data about the amount and whereabouts of DU used in Kosov@ and Serbia.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Proposed CADU International Conference 1st and 2nd July
2000 Manchester - England
Although CADU is a relatively new campaign group we have experienced
exponential growth and now receive international attention. Our bulletins
and briefings are bringing us enquiries from places as far apart as the
United States, Nigeria, India and Switzerland.
The issues around depleted uranium are still contentious. There are some
who question the severity of the problem. Some say that claims of its
threat and the ill effects that it causes have been exaggerated. Therefore,
we would like to have a forum for the debate. We plan to have a two day
weekend conference based around speakers and workshops in Manchester town
hall. We expect between eighty and one hundred and fifty delegates from
across the globe.
Workshops and speakers would discuss such topics as the medical effects
of DU, the use of DU in Iraq and in the Balkans, as well as planning for
future campaigns and events.
The conference will be linked to the UN year for a culture of peace.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Videos Available
We have a number of videos on DU available on loan by groups or individuals.
These include copies of 'Metal of Dishonour', 'Let Iraqi Children Live',
by Desert Concerns, copies of the documentaries shown on the Tonight (with
Trevor McDonald) programme, and soon the 60 minutes documentary (from
the US), a film made by independent journalists, and a film made by a
Japanese group. The loan is free or donation - just send us the postage
costs. Contact the CADU office.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
What is CADU
The Campaign Against Depleted Uranium is a small volunteer run group,
based in Manchester which was set up in January 1999 to campaign for a
ban on depleted uranium weapons. We are linked to both a European Network
Against Depleted Uranium, and a global network opposed to DU. We produce
a briefing pack (£3.50 inc. p&p), leaflets, and other resources. Groups
and individuals can affiliate to CADU (see enclosed sheet), and become
part of this world-wide pressure to stop DU.
CADU's aims are:
o to fight for a global ban on the manufacture, export, and use of depleted
uranium weapons
o to fight for recognition by the MoD that these weapons are connected
with illnesses among Gulf War veterans and civilians in Iraq and elsewhere
o to put pressure on governments who use DU to take responsibility for
environmental de-contamination or areas where it has been used.
Back to Top
_________________________________________________________
Current UK government position on DU
In a letter dated 21.12.99, to one of CADU's supporters, MP Peter Hain,
of the Foreign and Commonwealth Office stated:-
"The use of depleted uranium is not prohibited under international humanitarian
law. Depleted uranium ammunition is in service because of its unique ability
to penetrate modern battle tank armour. It is not a nuclear weapon as
it relies wholly on kinetic energy, like any projectile, not a nuclear
reaction. Suggestions that exposure to depleted uranium ammunition causes
health problems are not backed by scientific evidence. The Government
would nonetheless, consider carefully any evidence which may emerge concerning
incidence of ill health in Iraq. UK forces did not use depleted uranium
during the conflict with Yugoslavia this year."
We've included this because it shows how deaf the government are being
to the mounting clamour against depleted uranium. Their position, to the
last word, has not changed - obviously coming from on high. Further, the
fact that UK forces did not use DU may be true, but NATO forces did, and
the UK is a part of NATO, and has to bear some responsibility for actions
of NATO during conflicts.
Back to Top
Page last updated: 6th December 2002
|